Look Out! It’s Momentum!

Gabrielle Birchak/ July 9, 2024/ Ancient History, Modern History, Post Classical

I’m sure some of my read­ers have heard about the JATO rock­et car, often not­ed as a Dar­win award. You know, that hon­or award­ed to indi­vid­u­als who have self-elim­i­nat­ed them­selves through sheer idio­cy. The sto­ry starts in the 1950s dur­ing an episode of the Lawrence Welk show. If you don’t know what that is, I advise you to look it up on YouTube. It’s best enjoyed when you’ve eat­en an edi­ble or are enjoy­ing your evening liba­tion or drink. So, back to the episode of the Lawrence Welk show. A com­mer­cial about the Dodge Coro­net, equipped with JATO units, had aired. The units demon­strat­ed the pow­er of the company’s “total con­tact” brakes.

This fic­tion­al sto­ry is born out of that com­mer­cial and tells about a man who decid­ed to give his Chevy Impala a tur­bocharged boost—literally. He just hap­pened to have a JATO unit, an acronym for a Jet-Assist­ed Take Off unit. Heavy mil­i­tary trans­port planes typ­i­cal­ly use this JATO unit for short air­field take­offs. So, equipped with this unit, this intre­pid dri­ver head­ed into the Ari­zona desert, where he found a long, straight stretch of road. He then attached the JATO unit to his car and hit the igni­tion.
The JATO would have reached max­i­mum thrust with­in five sec­onds, pro­pelling the Impala to speeds well over 350 MPH, which is also 560 km/h. Accord­ing to the false sto­ry, for 15 to 20 sec­onds, the car remained on the straight high­way for about 2.5 miles before the dri­ver melt­ed the brakes and blew the tires. At this point, he hit a bump and became air­borne for 1.4 miles. His grand finale was when he hit the face of a cliff at 125 feet, which left a black­ened crater. The sto­ry goes on to say that most of the driver’s remains were not recov­er­able. Still, bone, teeth, and hair frag­ments were extract­ed from the crater.

And this is my intro­duc­tion to the top­ic of momentum! 

How much does a ton of feath­ers weigh? My dad would always tell me that joke. I don’t know why; I knew the punch line. It weighs a ton. It’s also a great joke when dis­cussing Aristotle’s dis­cov­er­ies. Aris­to­tle believed that heav­ier objects fall faster than lighter ones. He also thought that a con­tin­u­ous force is required to keep an object in motion. So, for all we know, he might have dropped a ton of feath­ers from a Cliff to see how fast it fell, but more than like­ly not. Aris­to­tle did not con­duct exper­i­ments on momen­tum in the mod­ern sense. Instead, he for­mu­lat­ed the­o­ries based on obser­va­tions and philo­soph­i­cal rea­son­ing. Aristotle’s ideas on motion, which includ­ed con­cepts relat­ed to what we now under­stand as momen­tum, were part of his broad­er work in physics.

Aris­to­tle believed that all objects have a nat­ur­al place in the uni­verse and that they move toward that place. His the­o­ries includ­ed Nat­ur­al Motion, where­in he spec­u­lat­ed that objects move nat­u­ral­ly in straight lines toward their nat­ur­al places. For exam­ple, he not­ed that heavy objects fall towards the Earth while light objects rise towards the heavens.

By solut_rai — https://pixabay.com/fr/photos/philosophie-gr%C3%A8ce-socrates-statue-2603284/, CC0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=79287506

He also wrote about Vio­lent Motion, which is the type of motion that occurs when an object is forced to move in a way con­trary to its nat­ur­al motion, such as push­ing a rock uphill. Aris­to­tle believed that an exter­nal force was need­ed to main­tain this motion. And then there’s the con­cept of Impe­tus, which was not ful­ly devel­oped by Aris­to­tle. How­ev­er, his con­cept of Impe­tus sug­gests that an object in motion car­ries with it some force that keeps it mov­ing. This idea was lat­er devel­oped by medieval schol­ars. It can be seen as an ear­ly pre­cur­sor to the mod­ern con­cept of momentum.

Aristotle’s approach was more qual­i­ta­tive than quan­ti­ta­tive, rely­ing on log­i­cal rea­son­ing rather than exper­i­men­tal evi­dence. His the­o­ries dom­i­nat­ed West­ern thought until the sci­en­tif­ic rev­o­lu­tion, when fig­ures like Galileo and New­ton used exper­i­ments to bet­ter under­stand motion and momen­tum. Sad­ly, indi­vid­u­als like Galileo and New­ton were ostra­cized and, worse yet, impris­oned for their find­ings that opposed the church, which held stead­fast to the con­cepts pre­sent­ed by Aristotle.

By Iran post — http://akifaltundal.net/tur/images/stories/
matematik_pullari/matematikci/
AVICENNA_Abu_Ali_al_Husain_ibn_Abdallah_ibn_Sina/
avicenna14.jpg, Pub­lic Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=64290684

Mov­ing for­ward in his­to­ry, we arrive at the Islam­ic Gold­en Age from the eighth to the four­teenth cen­tu­ry. Dur­ing this peri­od, schol­ars in the Islam­ic world made sig­nif­i­cant con­tri­bu­tions to sci­ence and math­e­mat­ics. One notable fig­ure was Ibn Sina (Avi­cen­na), who believed that a mov­ing object has a force that is dis­si­pat­ed by exter­nal agents like air resis­tance. This idea was an ear­ly pre­cur­sor to the con­cept of iner­tia, which is close­ly relat­ed to momentum.

THE RENAISSANCE

How­ev­er, most of our pri­ma­ry dis­cov­er­ies about momen­tum come from the Renais­sance. Ah, the Renais­sance! It was a peri­od of cul­tur­al, artis­tic, and intel­lec­tu­al revival in Europe from the four­teenth cen­tu­ry to the sev­en­teenth cen­tu­ry. This peri­od was influ­enced by a range of fac­tors, includ­ing polit­i­cal, eco­nom­ic, and social changes. This age saw the rise of wealthy and pow­er­ful city-states, such as those in Italy, like Flo­rence, Venice, and Milan. These city-states were ruled by influ­en­tial fam­i­lies who were patrons of the arts and the sci­ences and finan­cial­ly sup­port­ed artists, archi­tects, and schol­ars. In sea­son three, episode six­ty-three, I talk about the math­e­mat­i­cal com­pe­ti­tions and Tartaglia’s brilliance.

Also, dur­ing this time, Con­stan­tino­ple fell, which led to the migra­tion of Greek schol­ars into Italy, who brought with them clas­si­cal texts and more knowl­edge. There was a rise in human­ism where­in the intel­lec­tu­al move­ment empha­sized the study of clas­si­cal texts, indi­vid­ual poten­tial and the impor­tance of human val­ues. Peo­ple served as polit­i­cal advis­ers and pro­mot­ed edu­ca­tion and civic respon­si­bil­i­ty. And this was also the time of the bur­geon­ing mer­chant class. Peo­ple had mon­ey to play with, so they played with sci­ence and math.

By Jus­tus Suster­mans — https://www.uffizi.it/en/artworks/portrait-galileo-galilei-by-justus-sustermans%20, Pub­lic Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=91819543 - Mod­i­fied by Gabrielle Bir­chak

As a result, sci­en­tists like Galileo Galilei and Sir Isaac New­ton made dis­cov­er­ies that rev­o­lu­tion­ized our under­stand­ing of momen­tum and motion. I talk exten­sive­ly about Galileo in sea­son three, episodes fifty-sev­en and fifty-eight, if you want to learn more about his inqui­si­tion. He is often referred to as the “father of mod­ern sci­ence” and con­duct­ed exper­i­ments that chal­lenged Aris­totelian physics. He observed momen­tum by con­duct­ing exper­i­ments with inclined planes and pen­du­lums. In doing so, he demon­strat­ed that the veloc­i­ty of falling objects is inde­pen­dent of their mass. He also intro­duced the con­cept of iner­tia, stat­ing that an object in motion remains in motion unless act­ed upon by an exter­nal force.

By God­frey Kneller — http://www.phys.uu.nl/~vgent/astrology/images/newton1689.jpg], Pub­lic Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=146431 — Mod­i­fied by Gabrielle Birchak

These ideas cul­mi­nat­ed with Sir Isaac New­ton, whose work laid the foun­da­tion for clas­si­cal mechan­ics. New­ton for­mu­lat­ed three laws of motion, with the first law of motion stat­ing that a body in motion remains in motion or a body at rest remains at rest unless act­ed upon by a force. His sec­ond law states that the force act­ing on an object is equal to the rate of change of its momen­tum, and the third law states that for every action, there is an equal and oppo­site reac­tion. It is his sec­ond law that is most fun­da­men­tal to the con­cept of momen­tum. I’ll just state it again for kicks, his sec­ond law states that the force act­ing on an object is equal to the rate of change of its momentum.

This law of motion defines how objects move when forces act on them. For exam­ple, when you push or pull an object, you apply a force to it. The speed at which an object moves, its accel­er­a­tion, depends on the net force that acts on it. For exam­ple, imag­ine that you have a toy car. The hard­er you push the toy car, the faster it accelerates.

Newton’s sec­ond law is math­e­mat­i­cal­ly expressed as accel­er­a­tion equals the net force divid­ed by the object’s mass. Newton’s sec­ond law can be expressed math­e­mat­i­cal­ly as:

a=\frac{\Sigma f}{m}

Where­in a rep­re­sents accel­er­a­tion, Sig­ma f is the net force act­ing on the object in all direc­tions, and m is the mass of the object.

What this means is if you dou­ble the net force, the accel­er­a­tion of the object dou­bles as well. Also, if you dou­ble the mass, the accel­er­a­tion is halved. For exam­ple, when the same force is applied, lighter objects accel­er­ate more eas­i­ly than heav­ier ones. So, let’s say you need to move a fil­ing cab­i­net across the room. If you emp­ty the fil­ing cab­i­net before you push it, it will move more eas­i­ly than if you push it across the room with all the files in it. And this is a real case sce­nario because I was just reor­ga­niz­ing my office the oth­er day!

NINETEENTH CENTURY AND BEYOND

The nine­teenth cen­tu­ry wit­nessed fur­ther advance­ments in the study of momen­tum, par­tic­u­lar­ly with the devel­op­ment of the con­ser­va­tion laws. The prin­ci­ple of con­ser­va­tion of momen­tum states that the total momen­tum of an iso­lat­ed sys­tem remains con­stant if no exter­nal forces act upon it. This prin­ci­ple is a direct con­se­quence of Newton’s laws and has far-reach­ing impli­ca­tions in var­i­ous fields.

With­in this def­i­n­i­tion, there are two key types of momen­tum con­ser­va­tion. The first is lin­ear momen­tum con­ser­va­tion, and the sec­ond is angu­lar momen­tum conservation.

In lin­ear momen­tum con­ser­va­tion, like a col­li­sion, the total lin­ear momen­tum before an event equals the total lin­ear momen­tum after the event. With angu­lar momen­tum con­ser­va­tion, in an iso­lat­ed sys­tem, the total angu­lar momen­tum remains con­stant if no exter­nal torques are act­ing on it.

So, let’s imag­ine two cars col­lid­ing head-on and com­ing to a stop. Before the col­li­sion, both vehi­cles are mov­ing with spe­cif­ic veloc­i­ties. Accord­ing to Newton’s third law of motion, the forces each car exerts on the oth­er are equal in mag­ni­tude and oppo­site in direction.

Lin­ear Momen­tum Con­ser­va­tion states that the system’s total momen­tum (both cars togeth­er) remains con­stant if no exter­nal forces act on it. In this case, the only exter­nal force might be fric­tion with the road, which is usu­al­ly neg­li­gi­ble in such a short timeframe.

So, before the col­li­sion, the total momen­tum of both cars com­bined (con­sid­er­ing their mass­es and veloc­i­ties) is equal to the total momen­tum after the col­li­sion, where they come to a stop.

Angu­lar Momen­tum Con­ser­va­tion refers to the rota­tion­al motion of an object. In the con­text of a car acci­dent, let’s con­sid­er the wheels of the cars spin­ning before and after the collision.

When the two cars col­lid­ed, before the col­li­sion, their wheels were spin­ning. Angu­lar momen­tum is like the spin of a top or a spin­ning wheel. When the vehi­cles col­lide, if there are no exter­nal forces mak­ing the wheels stop sud­den­ly (like hit­ting some­thing on the road), the spin­ning motion of the wheels (angu­lar momen­tum) would stay the same. This means that the total “spin ener­gy” in the wheels before the col­li­sion will be the same as the total “spin ener­gy” after the crash.

So, even though the cars might crash and stop mov­ing for­ward, their wheels’ spin­ning motion (angu­lar momen­tum) remains unchanged unless some­thing exter­nal stops them, like hit­ting a curb.

These con­ser­va­tion laws are cru­cial in ana­lyz­ing and pre­dict­ing the behav­ior of objects in var­i­ous phys­i­cal sce­nar­ios, from sim­ple col­li­sions to com­plex sys­tems in astrophysics.

THE TWENTIETH CENTURY

By Lang­hans, J. F. — http://doi.org/10.3932/ethz-a-000045912, Pub­lic Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=45267980 — mod­i­fied by Gabrielle Birchak

It is one of my favorite cen­turies because we talk about Albert Ein­stein. In the 20th cen­tu­ry, Albert Ein­stein devel­oped the the­o­ry of rel­a­tiv­i­ty. Rel­a­tiv­i­ty intro­duced sig­nif­i­cant changes to our under­stand­ing of momen­tum, espe­cial­ly at high veloc­i­ties approach­ing the speed of light.

In rel­a­tivis­tic mechan­ics, momen­tum is defined dif­fer­ent­ly to account for the effects of rel­a­tiv­i­ty. As a result, the for­mu­la changes because New­ton­ian mechan­ics no longer accu­rate­ly describes momen­tum because veloc­i­ties are sub­stan­tial frac­tions of the speed of light.

Math­e­mat­i­cal­ly, rel­a­tivis­tic momen­tum is defined as:

p=\gamma m v

where:

p is the rel­a­tivis­tic momen­tum,
γ (gam­ma) is the Lorentz fac­tor, which is

\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt {1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

m is the rest mass of the object,
v is the veloc­i­ty of the object,
c is the speed of light in a vac­u­um where­in (c≈3×108 meters per second).

This appli­ca­tion ensures that the laws of physics, includ­ing the con­ser­va­tion of momen­tum, hold true in all ref­er­ence frames.

QUANTUM MECHANICS AND MODERN PHYSICS

Louis de Broglie By Unknown author — http://www.physics.umd.edu/courses/Phys420/
Spring2002/Parra_Spring2002/HTMPages/
whoswho.htm, Pub­lic Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=622169 — Mod­i­fied by Gabrielle Birchak

As the 20th cen­tu­ry pro­gressed, the devel­op­ment of quan­tum mechan­ics fur­ther enriched our under­stand­ing of momen­tum. In quan­tum mechan­ics, momen­tum is described as an oper­a­tor that acts on the wave func­tion of par­ti­cles. Louis de Broglie intro­duced his hypoth­e­sis that intro­duced the con­cept of mat­ter waves, which states that par­ti­cles like elec­trons exhib­it par­ti­cle-like and wave-like prop­er­ties. This dual­i­ty is essen­tial in under­stand­ing phe­nom­e­na at the atom­ic and sub­atom­ic lev­els. How­ev­er, we can’t quite under­stand the phe­nom­e­na until we look at Wern­er Heisenberg’s uncer­tain­ty prin­ci­ple, which states that a particle’s posi­tion and momen­tum can­not be pre­cise­ly deter­mined simul­ta­ne­ous­ly. This prin­ci­ple has pro­found impli­ca­tions for our under­stand­ing of the behav­ior of par­ti­cles at the quan­tum lev­el. It high­lights the prob­a­bilis­tic nature of quan­tum mechanics.

Wern­er Heisen­berg — By Unknown author — Mac­Tu­tor, Pub­lic Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2929925 — mod­i­fied by Gabrielle Birchak

In the de Broglie hypoth­e­sis, let’s imag­ine small par­ti­cles, like elec­trons, behav­ing not just as tiny balls but also as waves. The de Broglie hypoth­e­sis sug­gests that each par­ti­cle has a cor­re­spond­ing wave­length, sim­i­lar to how light or sound waves have wave­lengths. The wave­length depends on the particle’s speed, which is momentum.

Now, because par­ti­cles have this wave-like nature, we can’t pin­point their exact loca­tion and speed (aka momen­tum) simul­ta­ne­ous­ly. Heisenberg’s Uncer­tain­ty Prin­ci­ple tells us that when we pre­cise­ly know one of these things (like where a par­ti­cle is), the less accu­rate­ly we can know the oth­er (like how fast it’s moving).

APPLICATIONS OF MOMENTUM IN VARIOUS FIELDS

Momen­tum is not just a the­o­ret­i­cal con­cept con­fined to physics text­books; it has prac­ti­cal appli­ca­tions in var­i­ous fields. In space explo­ration, momen­tum plays a cru­cial role in the move­ment and con­trol of space­craft. The con­ser­va­tion of momen­tum is uti­lized in maneu­vers such as sling­shot tech­niques, where a space­craft gains momen­tum by pass­ing close to a plan­et, effec­tive­ly “steal­ing” some of the planet’s momentum.

In engi­neer­ing, under­stand­ing momen­tum is essen­tial for design­ing vehi­cle safe­ty fea­tures, such as posi­tion of airbags and crum­ble zones. These fea­tures are designed to man­age the forces and momen­tum dur­ing col­li­sions, reduc­ing the impact on pas­sen­gers and increas­ing safe­ty.
In sports, momen­tum is a crit­i­cal fac­tor in the per­for­mance of ath­letes. Whether it’s a foot­ball play­er trans­fer­ring momen­tum to the ball dur­ing a kick or a gym­nast using their momen­tum to exe­cute a flip, under­stand­ing and con­trol­ling momen­tum can make a sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ence in performance.

In finance and eco­nom­ics, momen­tum invest­ing is a strat­e­gy where investors buy secu­ri­ties that have per­formed well in the past, bet­ting that they will con­tin­ue to do so. This strat­e­gy is based on the idea that pos­i­tive trends in momen­tum can per­sist, sim­i­lar to how momen­tum works in physics.

Momen­tum has also made its mark in pop­u­lar cul­ture, often being used metaphor­i­cal­ly to describe sit­u­a­tions where there is a build-up of ener­gy or force that dri­ves events for­ward. Whether in movies, sports com­men­tary, or every­day lan­guage, momen­tum res­onates with peo­ple as a pow­er­ful force that can shape outcomes.

As we look to the future, the study of momen­tum con­tin­ues to evolve. Advances in tech­nol­o­gy and exper­i­men­tal tech­niques are allow­ing sci­en­tists to explore momen­tum at even small­er scales and high­er ener­gies. The devel­op­ment of par­ti­cle accel­er­a­tors, such as the Large Hadron Col­lid­er, enables researchers to probe the fun­da­men­tal prop­er­ties of par­ti­cles and their inter­ac­tions, deep­en­ing our under­stand­ing of momen­tum in the process.

Addi­tion­al­ly, the explo­ration of dark mat­ter and dark ener­gy, which make up the major­i­ty of the uni­verse, presents new chal­lenges and oppor­tu­ni­ties for the study of momen­tum. Under­stand­ing how these mys­te­ri­ous com­po­nents of the uni­verse inter­act with reg­u­lar mat­ter and influ­ence cos­mic momen­tum is an excit­ing fron­tier in mod­ern physics.

From ancient Greek philoso­phers to mod­ern physi­cists, the con­cept of momen­tum has evolved and expand­ed, influ­enc­ing a wide range of fields and appli­ca­tions. Under­stand­ing momen­tum enhances our com­pre­hen­sion of the nat­ur­al world and pro­vides prac­ti­cal insights that impact our every­day lives. But of all the con­cepts I talked about, there is one type of momen­tum I have not men­tioned yet, and it’s the most valu­able con­cept of all. It is that momen­tum that lives in our hearts.

Some­times it could be a sub­ject mat­ter that we absolute­ly adore and can’t get enough of, in my case, the his­to­ry of math and sci­ence. Some­times, it could be your favorite dessert. There’s momen­tum with­in you to buy it and enjoy every bite. Some­times, it could be a human you adore and want to spend the rest of your life with. You are pulled to them with some invis­i­ble force. Oth­er times, it could be a lost pet that some­one aban­doned, and you end up adopt­ing it and lov­ing it uncon­di­tion­al­ly. And then there’s the momen­tum that dri­ves us to help oth­ers, to give to char­i­ties, and to devote our time and our lives to ensur­ing the well-being of oth­ers. This momen­tum in our hearts dri­ves us to be bet­ter humans, putting our con­science and human­i­ty first. Some may think that momen­tum is love, but to me, that’s not just love; that is physics. Beau­ti­ful, incred­i­ble, impact­ful (pun intend­ed) physics. We are like the stars in the sky that swirl to the momen­tum of grav­i­ty and the sub­atom­ic par­ti­cles that are attract­ed or repelled by exter­nal forces. We are part of this beau­ti­ful Dance of momen­tum that the uni­verse has cre­at­ed. That said, here is to the momen­tum that resides in your hearts! Until next time, carpe diem, my friends!

Share this Post