Ancient Women in Science

Gabrielle Birchak/ May 31, 2022/ Ancient History

Loca­tions of Hypa­ti­a’s Contemporaries

In the ear­ly sixth cen­tu­ry, around the year 535, Amala­suintha, the Queen of the Ostro­goths wrote a let­ter to the preg­nant Roman Empress Theodo­ra to wish her good health. It was a let­ter filled with rev­er­ence and deep respect. What is inter­est­ing about this is that the Ostro­goths had encroached upon Roman land. But Amalasuintha’s father, Theodor­ic the Great, died, and Amala­suintha took the throne. She sought to cre­ate peace­ful rela­tions between the Romans and the Goths. And so, about nine years into her reign, she wrote a let­ter to Empress Theodo­ra, stat­ing, “Har­mo­ny exists not only between those who are in each oth­ers’ pres­ence; indeed, those joined togeth­er in the char­i­ty of the spir­it have an even greater respect for each oth­er.”[1] Thus, amidst our his­to­ries that are dense with male rulers and their wars, we have insight into an ami­ca­ble friend­ship between female rulers and lead­ers in late ancient and ear­ly post-clas­si­cal his­to­ry. This let­ter leads me to won­der what the state of the world would be if more women in his­to­ry had the chance to obtain lead­er­ship roles. And as a woman who once worked in STEM, it also leads me to won­der how dif­fer­ent our world of sci­ence would be if women had been giv­en easy access to stud­ies in sci­ence and mathematics.

Amala­suintha was born in 495 CE, 100 years after Hypa­tia flour­ished in Alexan­dria. For those unfa­mil­iar with Hypa­tia of Alexan­dria, she was a promi­nent pro­fes­sor of math­e­mat­ics and phi­los­o­phy. And though Hypa­tia was one of our ear­li­est female math­e­mati­cians, she was not the first. Though Hypa­tia stands out in his­to­ry as an excep­tion in an ancient cul­ture that prac­ticed exclu­siv­i­ty, she was not the only woman in this time to make out­stand­ing strides in science.

Pan­dro­sion

One of our ear­li­est known female math­e­mati­cians was Pan­dro­sion of Alexan­dria. Pan­dro­sion was a con­tem­po­rary of math­e­mati­cian Pap­pus. His men­tion of her in his work Math­e­mat­i­cal Col­lec­tion was writ­ten around 320. Thus, Pan­dro­sion was an old­er con­tem­po­rary of Hypatia’s father, Theon. As a result, she might have lived long enough to meet Hypa­tia.[2]

As a math­e­mati­cian, Pan­dro­sion also taught math and, like Hypa­tia, had a fol­low­ing of dis­ci­ples and stu­dents who val­ued her teach­ings. We are first intro­duced to Pan­dro­sion by the math­e­mati­cian Pap­pus, who wrote about her in the third book of his work Math­e­mat­i­cal Col­lec­tion. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, his first ref­er­ence to her is not pleas­ant. He appears intent on repu­di­at­ing her and insult­ing her. He writes, “Cer­tain peo­ple who claim to have learned math­e­mat­ics from you, set out the enun­ci­a­tion of the prob­lems in what seemed to us an igno­rant man­ner.” Pap­pus writes that Pandrosion’s stu­dents do not under­stand the mate­r­i­al and do not under­stand the dif­fer­ence between a prob­lem and a the­o­rem. He then adds that acad­e­mia must cen­sure any teacher who con­fus­es these terms.[3] I know I should not pro­vide a mod­ern-day per­spec­tive on this writ­ing, but I can’t help but think that Pap­pus might have been either intim­i­dat­ed by Pan­dro­sion or just a cranky old man.

Pan­dro­sion had many stu­dents who, like Hypatia’s stu­dents, went on to become renowned lead­ers and philoso­phers. Like Hypa­tia, she was a men­tor to her stu­dents and worked side-by-side with her stu­dents with a rig­or that would be con­sis­tent with today’s grad­u­ate stud­ies. Thus, she was suc­cess­ful in an indus­try dom­i­nat­ed by men. Through her work, she might have even inspired Hypa­tia to per­sist in academia.

Saint Fabi­o­la Of Rome

Focus­ing on women in sci­ence, phi­los­o­phy, and math with­in Hypatia’s time, I want to note sev­er­al oth­er promi­nent women in sci­ence between 200 and 400 CE. One indi­vid­ual who stands out was Saint Fabi­o­la of Rome. Fabi­o­la lived dur­ing the same years as Hypa­tia in the late fourth cen­tu­ry and the ear­ly fifth cen­tu­ry. She was born into wealth and was a noble Roman matron of rank. She worked with Saint Jerome, who pre­served her life sto­ry through his let­ters and writ­ings, stat­ing, “Often did she car­ry on her own shoul­ders per­sons infect­ed with jaun­dice or with filth. Often too did she wash away the mat­ter dis­charge from wounds which oth­ers, even tough men, could not bear to look at. She gave food to her patients with her own hand, and moist­ened the scarce read­ing lips of the dying with sips of liq­uid.” Thus as we can see, in her lat­er life, she was altru­is­tic in her endeavors.

How­ev­er, as a young woman, she mar­ried and endured an abu­sive hus­band. Jerome wrote that her hus­band “pos­sessed such vices that not even a pros­ti­tute or a low slave could endure them.”[4] Fabi­o­la divorced her hus­band. Though these actions were unthink­able to church lead­ers in the fourth cen­tu­ry, Roman law still allowed for divorce pro­ceed­ings. After her divorce, Fabi­o­la remar­ried. She believed it was accept­able even though her pre­vi­ous hus­band was still alive. After her sec­ond hus­band died, Fabi­o­la altered the course of her life.

Jerome writes that on the day before East­er, she “put on (a) sack­cloth,” stood before the gates of the Lat­er­an Basil­i­ca, and pub­licly repent­ed for her sins and rela­tion­ships with men.[5] Upon her con­fes­sion, the Pope allowed her to have full com­mu­nion with the church, where she even­tu­al­ly became a mem­ber. She then sold some of her estates and used the funds to open a hos­pi­tal in Rome. The hos­pi­tal was the first of its kind. Before the church con­struct­ed this hos­pi­tal for Rome, most health­care providers tend­ed to the ill in pri­vate homes. Thus, Fabiola’s act of char­i­ty altered the course of med­ical history.

Fabiola’s ded­i­ca­tion to those in need far exceed­ed her mon­e­tary con­tri­bu­tions. She devot­ed her life to human­i­ty as she wait­ed on prison inmates, fed them, and dressed their wounds. She gave mon­ey and cloth­ing to the poor and con­tin­ued to pro­vide copi­ous amounts of fund­ing to the church. She com­mit­ted her life to help­ing the home­less, the sick, and the unfor­tu­nate. Fabiola’s lifestyle choice was a deter­mined and per­son­al res­o­lu­tion dri­ven by a pas­sion for altruism.

In 395, Fabi­o­la lived in Jerusalem and stud­ied from Jerome for a brief while. How­ev­er, after the Huns infil­trat­ed the area, she moved back to Rome, where she con­tin­ued to assist the ill and the less for­tu­nate. Jerome appoint­ed sev­er­al monks to con­tin­ue her work and con­duct her mon­e­tary con­tri­bu­tions as she grew old. In 399, Fabi­o­la died in her sleep. In 537, the church can­on­ized her as St. Fabi­o­la.[6]

Sosi­pa­tra of Pergamum

Sosi­pa­tra of Perga­mum was a promi­nent female philoso­pher who lived in the late fourth cen­tu­ry and ear­ly fifth cen­tu­ry. She was born in Eph­esus and lived out her lat­er years in Perga­mum, a city now known as Berga­ma, in Turkey.

Sosi­pa­tra worked as a sec­ondary advi­sor to a pro­fes­sor named Chrysan­thius. Chrysan­thius taught Eunapius, a renowned his­to­ri­an whose works out­lined Neo­pla­ton­ism and its his­to­ry. Eunapius wrote Uni­ver­sal His­to­ry and The Lives of the Sophists and Philoso­phers, a col­lec­tion of twen­ty-three biogra­phies, includ­ing Sosipatra’s biography.

Eunapius wrote that Sosi­pa­tra was born into wealth. When she was five years old, her father entrust­ed two men, who were Chaldeans, to watch his farm and raise Sosi­pa­tra while he went away. When he came back, the two Chaldeans dis­ap­peared. The biog­ra­phy sug­gests that the two men were super­nat­ur­al beings and raised Sosi­pa­tra to learn about the mys­ter­ies of reli­gion and phi­los­o­phy. Eunapius not­ed that Sosipatra

“… had no oth­er teach­ers, but ever on her lips were the works of the poets, philoso­phers, and ora­tors; and those works that oth­ers com­pre­hend but incom­plete­ly and dim­ly, and then only by hard work and painful drudgery, she could expound with care­less ease, serene­ly and pain­less­ly, and with her light swift touch would make their mean­ing clear.”[7]

When Sosi­pa­tra was old­er she mar­ried Eustathius who was a stu­dent of Iamblichus. The philoso­pher Eunapius wrote about her, stat­ing that “the renowned Eustathius mar­ried Sosi­pa­tra, who by her sur­pass­ing wis­dom made her own hus­band seem infe­ri­or and insignif­i­cant.”[8]

How­ev­er, Eustathius passed away five years after their mar­riage. After that, Sosi­pa­tra moved to Perga­mum with her three chil­dren, where she taught in Aedesius’s school and sur­passed the teach­ing skills of Aede­sius.[9]

Since Sosi­pa­tra mar­ried an Iamblichan pagan, it is like­ly that Sosi­pa­tra also adhered to Iamblichan philoso­phies. She had exten­sive knowl­edge of phi­los­o­phy, poet­ry, and rhetoric. Addi­tion­al­ly, Sosi­pa­tra only pro­vid­ed teach­ings in a pri­vate set­ting with­in her home. She did not have a ped­a­gogy or edu­cate her stu­dents with a struc­ture. Regard­less, Sosi­pa­tra was a promi­nent mem­ber of philo­soph­i­cal aca­d­e­mics who pur­sued and per­sist­ed in a time when soci­ety expect­ed most women to remain at home to raise their children.

Metrodo­ra

Metrodo­ra was a Greek physi­cian and gyne­col­o­gist who hails out of Egypt. She was one of history’s first not­ed gyne­col­o­gists. His­to­ri­ans esti­mate that Metrodo­ra lived some­time between 200 and 400 CE. There is no infor­ma­tion about where she was born and where she lived. Much of her work cov­ers gyne­col­o­gy and oth­er areas of med­i­cine. She authored many works, includ­ing On the Uterus, Abdomen and Kid­neys and the trea­tise On the Dis­eases and Cures of Women, which, at the time of the writ­ing of this book, his­to­ri­ans con­sid­er the old­est med­ical text writ­ten by a woman.[10]

On the Dis­eases and Cures of Women current­ly sur­vives in two vol­umes, which hold six­ty-three chap­ters. Hip­pocrates and his work Hip­po­crat­ic Cor­pus inspired Metrodo­ra, and so she ref­er­enced his work directly.In her exten­sive body of work, Metrodo­ra wrote about all facets of gyne­col­o­gy and includ­ed the first known alpha­bet­ized med­ical ency­clo­pe­dia.[11] Metrodora’s research was so broad that it advanced med­ical under­stand­ing of the­o­ry and eti­ol­o­gy, which cov­ers the cau­sa­tion of dis­eases.[12]

Of the intel­lec­tu­al women in sci­ence of this time, Metrodo­ra had a sim­i­lar acu­men and intel­lect as Hypa­tia. Metrodo­ra devot­ed her life to her clin­i­cal prac­tice, pre­serv­ing her find­ings, serv­ing her patients, advanc­ing sci­ence, and pro­mot­ing the sci­ence of gynecology.

Ascle­pi­ge­nia

Final­ly, there is Ascle­pi­ge­nia, who was born fif­teen years after Hypatia’s death. Ascle­pi­ge­nia was born in Athens and was the daugh­ter of the well-known philoso­pher Plutarch. Like Hypa­tia, Asclepigenia’s father raised and edu­cat­ed her to fol­low his voca­tion. Also, like Hypa­tia, Ascle­pi­ge­nia, along with her broth­er Hier­ro, took over her father’s school after Plutarch’s death. Aca­d­e­mics and stu­dents revered Ascle­pi­ge­nia for her philo­soph­i­cal intellect.

The Pow­er of Women

The let­ter that Queen Amala­suintha wrote to Roman Empress Theodo­ra is more than just a let­ter wish­ing her good health. She also seeks to remind her that a beau­ti­ful spir­it con­nects them, and that spir­it is a sis­ter­ly bond that has always pre­vailed among humans and the crea­tures in our ani­mal kingdom.

Clear­ly these women per­se­vered and remained in acad­e­mia and sci­ence despite any obsta­cles they might have encoun­tered. They lived in a soci­ety that expect­ed them to devote their com­plete lives to their chil­dren and their spous­es, but nev­er to a cho­sen occu­pa­tion. Thus, hav­ing been writ­ten into his­to­ry, their roles in acad­e­mia and sci­ence were overt­ly evi­dent to soci­ety, their male con­tem­po­raries, the gov­ern­ment, and the church.

These impres­sive female sci­en­tists and philoso­phers may or may not have known each oth­er. If they did know each oth­er, I often won­der if they encour­aged each oth­er, much like Amala­suintha encour­aged Theodo­ra? Or did the sub­stan­tial male-to-female ratio in phi­los­o­phy, sci­ence, and math in late antiq­ui­ty pos­si­bly lead these women to feel as though they were alone in their endeav­ors? For Hypa­tia, if she had become aware of anoth­er female con­tem­po­rary in Rome, would this have inspired her to con­tin­ue in her endeav­ors? Like­wise, did she embold­en and moti­vate others?

Even in our cur­rent era, it is com­mon for women to feel out­num­bered by men. All too often, as a woman sur­round­ed by men in the lab, it can feel iso­lat­ing and lone­ly. I have expe­ri­enced this myself.

Hypa­tia, Pan­dro­sion, Sosi­pa­tra, Fabi­o­la, Metrodo­ra, and Ascle­pi­ge­nia, had even few­er female con­tem­po­raries. Regard­less, these women forged unimag­in­able paths for oth­er women to pur­sue aca­d­e­mics, sci­ence, math, and phi­los­o­phy. Their actions required much courage in a church-based soci­ety filled with vit­ri­ol towards pagans and women who did not accli­mate to their soci­etal expectations.

Though min­i­mal and new to the world, this sis­ter­ly inspi­ra­tion was a pow­er­ful move­ment. Even though their advance­ments may have wavered for thou­sands of years they nev­er gave up. And so, I won­der how dif­fer­ent the world of sci­ence would be today if women, 2000 years ago, were giv­en a chance to pur­sue math and sci­ence. Would the encour­age­ment and sup­port back then have changed the state of sci­ence today? Unfor­tu­nate­ly, we can­not ful­ly immerse our­selves in his­to­ry to under­stand how we got to where we are today. But it is cer­tain­ly stir­ring to learn that these women and female lead­ers from our his­to­ries were intent on devel­op­ing ami­ca­ble and respect­ful rela­tion­ships with each oth­er while pur­su­ing a life out­side of the realms of soci­etal expec­ta­tions. It is equal­ly reas­sur­ing to see women in sci­ence today do the same. Here is to women in sci­ence! May we con­tin­ue to gal­va­nize the hearts of oth­er women and embold­en them with oppor­tu­ni­ties as they forge a larg­er path in science.

Until next time carpe diem!


[1]. Mar­celle Thiebaux, ed., The Writ­ings of Medieval Women, , Mar­celle Thiebaux (New York: Gar­land Pub­lish­ing, 1987), 22–23, https://archive.org/details/writingsofmediev00thie.

[2]. Michael A.B. Deakin, Math­e­mati­cian and mar­tyr: A biog­ra­phy of Hypa­tia of Alexan­dria (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2007), 132.

[3]. Edward J. Watts, Hypa­tia: The Life and Leg­end of an Ancient Philoso­pher (Oxford: Uni­ver­si­ty Press, 2017), 94.

[4]. Jerome and Euse­bius S. Hierony­mus, “Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series II, Vol. VI, Let­ter LXXVII. To Oceanus,” The Ter­tul­lian Project, last mod­i­fied Jan­u­ary 26, 2018, http://www.tertullian.org/fathers2/NPNF2-06/Npnf2-06–03.htm#P3291_863505.

[5]. Jerome and Euse­bius S. Hierony­mus, “Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series II, Vol. VI, Let­ter LXXVII. To Oceanus,” The Ter­tul­lian Project, last mod­i­fied Jan­u­ary 26, 2018, http://www.tertullian.org/fathers2/NPNF2-06/Npnf2-06–03.htm#P3291_863505.

[6]. Mol­ly Glentzer, “Fabi­o­la: The face that launched a legion of paint­ings,” Hous­ton Chron­i­cle, Decem­ber 30, 2016, https://www.houstonchronicle.com/entertainment/arts-theater/article/Fabiola-The-face-that-launched-a-legion-of-10826646.php.

[7]. Philo­stra­tus, Philo­stra­tus and Eunapius: The Lives of the Sophists, trans. Wilmer C. Wright (Lon­don: William Heine­mann, 1922), e‑book, 409.

[8]. Philo­stra­tus and Eunapius, Lives of the sophists (Lon­don: William Heine­mann, 1922), 400–401, https://archive.org/details/philostratuseuna00phil_0.

[9]. Philo­stra­tus, Philo­stra­tus and Eunapius: The Lives of the Sophists, trans. Wilmer C. Wright (Lon­don: William Heine­mann, 1922), e‑book, 409.

[10] Mar­garet Alic, “Chap­ter 2: Women and Sci­ence in the Ancient World,” in Hypa­ti­a’s Her­itage: A His­to­ry of Women in Sci­ence from Antiq­ui­ty Through the Nine­teenth Cen­tu­ry (Boston: Bea­con Press, 1986), 32, https://www.google.com/books/edition/Hypatia_s_Heritage/mxu9RxX1mDgC?hl=en&gbpv=0.

[11]. Judith P. Hal­lett and Mar­i­lyn B. Skin­ner, Roman Sexualities(Princeton: Prince­ton Uni­ver­si­ty Press, 1997), 199.

[12]. Sharon L. James and Sheila Dil­lon, A Com­pan­ion to Women in the Ancient World (Hobo­ken: John Wiley & Sons, 2012), 123.

Share this Post