The Murder of Evariste Galois

Gabriellebirchak/ June 11, 2024/ Late Modern History, Modern History

On May 30, a farmer in France had been pass­ing down a road and found a young man who had been shot in the stom­ach. He was still alive, so the farmer got the author­i­ties involved, who took him to a hos­pi­tal. Sad­ly, on May 31, at ten in the morn­ing, he died at the Hôpi­tal Cochin at the age of twen­ty.[1] His death is such a sad sto­ry of a bril­liant, pas­sion­ate young math­e­mati­cian. Through­out his young life, he had a series of ups and downs, includ­ing three rejec­tions from the uni­ver­si­ty where he applied to attend, three con­vic­tions that land­ed him in prison, and the death of his father. Through these dif­fi­cul­ties, he devel­oped a drink­ing prob­lem, which did not bode well with his tem­per. Short­ly after his third stint in prison, he moved into a hostel.

While he was there, he fell in love with a woman who was close to his age. How­ev­er, she had a fiancée. Regard­less, he was in love with her and real­ized this love was dan­ger­ous. And so, he wrote a friend the night before he left the hos­tel, explain­ing that he was afraid that some­one might kill him because of his con­nec­tion with her. And he was not wrong. In the ear­ly morn­ing of May 30, some­one shot him in the stom­ach. It was a sad out­come for such a bril­liant young man with much to con­tribute to math­e­mat­ics. Addi­tion­al­ly, the mur­der­ers remain unknown. His untime­ly death is a trag­ic loss to the world of math­e­mat­ics and a stark reminder of the fragili­ty of life. This is the sto­ry of Évariste Galois.

By Alfred Galois — Paul Dupuy (1896). “La vie d’Évariste Galois” (pdf). Annales sci­en­tifiques de l’É­cole nor­male supérieure 13: 248. Paris: Gau­thi­er-Vil­lars. Retrieved on 2016-08-24., Pub­lic Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=50864817

Évariste Galois was born in 1811 in Bourg-la-Reine, France, to Nico­las-Gabriel Galois and Adélaïde-Marie Demante. His father was a Repub­li­can, head of the Bourg-la-Reine lib­er­al par­ty, and vil­lage may­or. [2]  His moth­er edu­cat­ed him at home until he was twelve years old. She was high­ly edu­cat­ed in Latin and clas­si­cal lit­er­a­ture and specif­i­cal­ly taught him those sub­jects.[3] Math­e­mat­ics was not con­sid­ered nec­es­sary at this time in edu­ca­tion, so he was not pressed to study it. At twelve, he entered the Lycée Louis-le-Grand, which today would be the equiv­a­lent of a high school. While at the Lycée, at the age of four­teen, he devel­oped a fas­ci­na­tion with math­e­mat­ics and pol­i­tics. By the time he was fif­teen, he had read the orig­i­nal papers of Joseph-Louis Lagrange, includ­ing Reflec­tions on the Alge­bra­ic Solu­tions of Equa­tions and Lessons on the Cal­cu­lus of Func­tions. Reflec­tions inspired his lat­er work on equa­tion the­o­ry, and lessons on the cal­cu­lus of func­tions were a work reserved pri­mar­i­ly for pro­fes­sion­al mathematicians.

The grounds of Lycee Louis Le-grand

Galois was ready to attend the uni­ver­si­ty by the time he was sev­en­teen. He had his heart set on École Poly­tech­nique, which is con­sid­ered one of the most pres­ti­gious uni­ver­si­ties for math­e­mati­cians. In 1828, he attempt­ed the entrance exam­i­na­tion. Still, he failed because he was not pre­pared enough with the capac­i­ty to explain his work dur­ing the oral exam­i­na­tions.[4] As a result, instead of attend­ing the Poly­tech­nique, he entered the École Nor­male, con­sid­ered a sub­stan­dard insti­tu­tion. He applied at École Poly­tech­nique again in 1829 and was reject­ed yet again. With­in the same year, on July 2, his father com­mit­ted sui­cide after his polit­i­cal oppo­nents had framed him. These events dev­as­tat­ed Evariste and filled him up with a sense of injus­tice, as he had been a first­hand vic­tim of dev­as­tat­ing polit­i­cal baseness.

At eigh­teen, he pub­lished his first paper on con­tin­ued frac­tions. Addi­tion­al­ly, he was devel­op­ing the­o­ries on poly­no­mi­al equa­tions and sub­mit­ted two papers to the Acad­e­my of Sci­ences for the Academy’s Grand Prize in Math­e­mat­ics. Augustin-Louis Cauchy reviewed his work. The Acad­e­my did not accept Galois’s work for pub­li­ca­tion. There are two the­o­ries as to why his work was not accept­ed. Some his­to­ri­ans con­sid­er that Cauchy had asked him to com­bine his two papers for sub­mis­sion, which Galois did not. Oth­ers believe Cauchy reject­ed his work based on Galois’s polit­i­cal views, which Cauchy opposed.

This time frame was when King Charles X had suc­ceed­ed King Louis XIII in 1824. Six years lat­er, the oppo­si­tion Lib­er­al Par­ty became the major­i­ty. Strug­gling with this polit­i­cal oppo­si­tion, King Charles staged a coup d’etat, insti­gat­ing the French Rev­o­lu­tion of 1830. Galois was a staunch Repub­li­can and want­ed to par­tic­i­pate in the rev­o­lu­tion. How­ev­er, the direc­tor at École Nor­male locked in the stu­dents, pre­vent­ing them from leav­ing the grounds. Galois, con­sid­er­ably angry at this out­come, wrote a let­ter to The Gazette École with which he signed his entire name. Even though the gazette omit­ted his name from pub­li­ca­tion, the school gave him a notice of expul­sion that would take place on Jan­u­ary 4, 1831. Galois, instead, quit school and joined the repub­li­can artillery unit of the Nation­al Guard on Decem­ber 31, 1830. While in the guard, he divid­ed his time between math­e­mat­ics and pol­i­tics. How­ev­er, the guard had to dis­band short­ly after he joined as they were wor­ried that they might desta­bi­lize the government.

While involved in the rev­o­lu­tion, he con­tin­ued with his math­e­mat­ics. He tried to start teach­ing a pri­vate class in advanced alge­bra. Still, his efforts were min­i­mal as he was more involved with polit­i­cal activism. Regard­less, on Jan­u­ary 17, 1831, Galois sub­mit­ted his work on the the­o­ry of equa­tions to Siméon Denis Poisson.

Part of Galois’s Manuscript

While Pois­son reviewed his work, Galois con­tin­ued his efforts in the rev­o­lu­tion even though his guard had dis­band­ed. Dur­ing this time, nine­teen offi­cers of his unit were arrest­ed and charged with con­spir­a­cy to over­throw the gov­ern­ment. How­ev­er, the offi­cers were acquit­ted by April. As such, the mil­i­tary unit held a ban­quet in their hon­or. At the ban­quet, Galois stood and pro­posed a toast to Louis Philippe with a dag­ger over his cup. His fel­low guards­men cheered. As a result, he was arrest­ed the next day and put in deten­tion at Sainte-Pelagie prison for a month. Luck­i­ly, his attorney’s con­vinc­ing argu­ment influ­enced the jury to acquit him. How­ev­er, a month lat­er, on Bastille Day, Galois marched at the protest in his Nation­al Guard uni­form, heav­i­ly armed with pis­tols, a loaded rifle, and a dag­ger. He was arrest­ed and put in prison again. While in prison, he tried alco­hol for the first time, which led to an attempt­ed sui­cide. How­ev­er, his inmates stopped him.

Con­cur­rent­ly, while this was going on in Galois’s life, Pois­son, on July 4, 1831, declared Galois’s work “incom­pre­hen­si­ble” and sug­gest­ed that “the author pub­lished the whole of his work to form a defin­i­tive opin­ion.”[5]  How­ev­er, with all that Galois was doing for the rev­o­lu­tion, he was unaware of this. Galois’s tri­al was set for Octo­ber 23, 1831, when he was sen­tenced to six months in prison for ille­gal­ly wear­ing a uni­form. While in prison, he devel­oped his math­e­mat­i­cal the­o­ries and final­ly received Poisson’s let­ter. Galois was livid. As a result, he decid­ed to stop pub­lish­ing his papers through the Acad­e­my and instead pub­lish them pri­vate­ly through his friend Auguste Cheva­lier. Regard­less, he fol­lowed through on Poisson’s advice and devel­oped his work until he was released from prison on April 29, 1832.[6]

With­in the month of get­ting out, he stayed in a hos­tel, where he might have met the love inter­est, Stephanie-Feli­cie Poterin du Motel. She was the daugh­ter of the physi­cian at the hos­tel. At this point, things get extra­or­di­nar­i­ly chaot­ic for him. Accord­ing to let­ters between Galois and his friends, she had con­fid­ed in him about some trou­bles that she was in. His let­ters about this con­fi­den­tial infor­ma­tion to his friends have con­firmed this dis­clo­sure. The night before Galois died in a duel, he wrote to his cousin that he found him­self “in the pres­ence of a sup­posed uncle and a sup­posed fiancé, each of whom pro­voked the duel.” He con­tin­ued, “I am the vic­tim of an infa­mous coquette and her two dupes.”[7]

The final page of Galois’s math­e­mat­i­cal tes­ta­ment, in his own hand. The phrase “to deci­pher all this mess” (“déchiffr­er tout ce gâchis”) is on the sec­ond to the last line.
By Évariste Galois — Iyana­ga, Sho­kichi, “ガロアの時代 ガロアの数学 第一部 時代篇” , Springer-Ver­lag Tokyo, 1999, Pub­lic Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7374476

This let­ter, among oth­ers, was writ­ten the night before his mur­der. He had stayed up all night writ­ing these let­ters, includ­ing his math­e­mat­i­cal tes­ta­ment in a let­ter to Auguste Cheva­lier out­lin­ing his math­e­mat­i­cal the­o­ries. It was attached to three man­u­scripts, which like­ly includ­ed the work that he had been doing while in prison and the anno­tat­ed copy of the man­u­script that he sub­mit­ted to the Academy.

After he died in the hos­pi­tal, there were mild riots in the street. You see, Galois was a not­ed Repub­li­can and con­sid­ered a dan­ger­ous polit­i­cal oppo­nent by many. So, some the­o­rists and his­to­ri­ans believe that a female agent provo­ca­teur might have set up Galois. Nov­el­ist Alexan­dre Dumas named Pescheux d’Herbinville as his oppo­nent in the duel, based on news­pa­per descrip­tions. But Dumas is the only one who named him as the oppo­nent. How­ev­er, this doesn’t make sense because d’Herbinville was one of the nine­teen offi­cers who was acquit­ted and cel­e­brat­ed at the ban­quet Galois attend­ed. Addi­tion­al­ly, a descrip­tion of his oppo­nent alludes to Galois’s cell­mate, Earnest Duchatelet. But these are all spec­u­la­tions, and to this date, his killer has not been identified.

And so, on June 2, 1832, Evariste Galois was buried in a com­mon grave at Mont­par­nasse Ceme­tery.[8] In his home­town, Bourg-la-Reine, a ceno­taph in Galois’s hon­or, sits next to the graves of his rel­a­tives. Galois’s friend, Cheva­lier, accused the aca­d­e­mics at École Poly­tech­nique of hav­ing killed Galois, believ­ing that had they not reject­ed his work, he would have become a math­e­mati­cian instead of devot­ing his life to the repub­li­can polit­i­cal activism for which he was killed.[9]

Galois’s ceno­ta­phy at Mont­par­nasse Cemetary. Grave of Gabriel Galois and ceno­taph of Évariste Galois in Bourg-la-Reine By Beachboy68 — Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=4881086

GALOIS’S WORK

His work had not been pub­lished for over ten years, pos­si­bly due to the tim­ing of his death and the French Rev­o­lu­tion. Galois’s man­u­scripts were final­ly pub­lished in France’s Jour­nal of Pure and Applied Math­e­mat­ics in the Octo­ber-Novem­ber 1846 issue. In this work, Galois’s pro­found analy­ses led to what is now called Galois The­o­ry. This work shows that there is no quin­tic for­mu­la, mean­ing that fifth and high­er-degree equa­tions are not solv­able by rad­i­cals. And although math­e­mati­cians like Niels Hen­rik Abel and Pao­lo Ruffi­ni had pub­lished pre­vi­ous work on this the­o­ry, Galois had exten­sive deep research to show this proof.

I will go into some of the details of Galois’s find­ings, start­ing with the Galois the­o­ry. Galois The­o­ry pro­found­ly con­nects field the­o­ry and group the­o­ry, focus­ing on the solv­abil­i­ty of poly­no­mi­al equa­tions. Galois demon­strat­ed that a poly­no­mi­al is solv­able by rad­i­cals if and only if its Galois group is a solv­able group, gen­er­al­iz­ing ear­li­er work that showed the gen­er­al quin­tic equa­tion can­not be solved by radicals.

Speak­ing of groups, Galois intro­duced the con­cept of per­mu­ta­tion groups to ana­lyze the roots of poly­no­mi­als. Galois showed that the sym­me­tries of the roots of a poly­no­mi­al, which is known as a Galois Group, can show if the poly­no­mi­al can be solved by rad­i­cals. Anoth­er incred­i­bly bril­liant the­o­ry that he con­tributed to was field the­o­ry. Many his­to­ri­ans and math­e­mati­cians believe that Galois had the most pio­neer­ing mod­els on field the­o­ry. In his work, he devel­oped field exten­sions by adding the roots of poly­no­mi­als and ana­lyz­ing their properties.

Lat­tice of sub­groups and sub­fields show­ing their cor­re­spond­ing Galois groups.

Galois also intro­duced resol­vent poly­no­mi­als. This was done to deter­mine the Galois group of a giv­en poly­no­mi­al. So not only did he intro­duce Galois Groups, but he also intro­duced a way to solve them by pro­vid­ing resol­vent polynomials.

Galois, through his work, estab­lished the foun­da­tions of abstract alge­bra. For some, abstract alge­bra is a chal­leng­ing sub­ject. I know I strug­gled exten­sive­ly study­ing abstract alge­bra. But still, as some­body who prefers pure math­e­mat­ics over applied math­e­mat­ics, I fell in love with the sub­ject. Galois’s work laid the foun­da­tion for group the­o­ry and the study of poly­no­mi­al equa­tions, which influ­enced the devel­op­ment of mod­ern alge­bra. His ideas about the sym­me­try of roots of equa­tions and the group struc­ture asso­ci­at­ed with them became cen­tral to pure mathematics.

Lest we nev­er for­get his pas­sion for jus­tice. His involve­ment in the polit­i­cal tur­moil of his time, as he fought for the ideals and jus­tice for the peo­ple, high­lights a remark­able inter­sec­tion of intel­lec­tu­al bril­liance and civic com­mit­ment. Despite his life being cut trag­i­cal­ly short, it’s clear that his pro­found insights laid the ground­work for mod­ern abstract alge­bra and rev­o­lu­tion­ized our under­stand­ing of poly­no­mi­al equa­tions. His pio­neer­ing work on Galois the­o­ry, field exten­sions, group the­o­ry, and more to this day inspire and influ­ence physi­cists, chemists, com­put­er sci­en­tists, and, of course, math­e­mati­cians. Undoubt­ed­ly, his lega­cy is a tes­ta­ment to how bril­liant ideas can tran­scend time, fun­da­men­tal­ly shape the land­scape of math­e­mat­ics, and unlock new realms of possibility.

Thank you for lis­ten­ing to math sci­ence his­to­ry. And until next time, carpe diem!


[1] Bruno, Leonard C., and Lawrence W. Bak­er. Math and Math­e­mati­cians : The His­to­ry of Math Dis­cov­er­ies around the World. Detroit, Mich.: U X L, 1999.

[2] Bruno, Leonard C., and Lawrence W. Bak­er. Math and Math­e­mati­cians : The His­to­ry of Math Dis­cov­er­ies around the World. Detroit, Mich.: U X L, 1999.

[3] Roth­man, Tony. “The Short Life of Evariste Galois.” Sci­en­tif­ic Amer­i­can 246, no. 4 (1982): 136–49.

[4] Sar­ton, George. “Evariste Galois.” The Sci­en­tif­ic Month­ly 13, no. 4 (1921): 363–75.

[5] Taton, Rene. “Les rela­tions d’Evariste Galois avec les math­é­mati­ciens de son temps.” Revue d’histoire des sci­ences et de leurs appli­ca­tions 1, no. 2 (1947): 114–30. https://doi.org/10.3406/rhs.1947.2607.

[6] Dupuy, P. “La Vie d’Évariste Galois.” Annales Sci­en­tifiques de l’École Nor­male Supérieure 13 (1896): 197–266. https://doi.org/10.24033/asens.427.

[7] Dupuy, P. “La Vie d’Évariste Galois.” Annales Sci­en­tifiques de l’École Nor­male Supérieure 13 (1896): 197–266. https://doi.org/10.24033/asens.427.

[8] Bruno, Leonard C., and Lawrence W. Bak­er. Math and Math­e­mati­cians : The His­to­ry of Math Dis­cov­er­ies around the World. Detroit, Mich.: U X L, 1999.

[9] Lützen, J. “Chap­ter XIV: Galois The­o­ry.” In Joseph Liou­ville 1809–1882: Mas­ter of Pure and Applied Math­e­mat­ics, 559–80. Stud­ies in the His­to­ry of Math­e­mat­ics and Phys­i­cal Sci­ences. Springer New York, 2012. https://books.google.com/books?id=px_vBwAAQBAJ.


Share this Post